NF Collab Part 1 - Page 3 - erutufon|nofuture

**thembuzz** · 1st April 2009

yeah, ivan/joe/robi is my favourite, i reckon. and a bunch of other people are particularly ace, but i don't want to upset anyone by not mentioning them. also, i haven't bothered looking at who's who

**Loz** · 1st April 2009

their bit really reminds me of Guided By Voices. In a good way, obviously.

**emef** · 2nd April 2009

some people are saying the mix is a bit short
i think the beauty of the mix is in the shortness of the tracks, it never gets boring
why dont we do it all again? kicking off from where isoprax finished, same 32 bar rule, adding people who missed out and people who wanna go again
keep going till we've got a 1 hour+ mix
i reckon that'd be great

i also really like the doing vocals in the tracks idea

ps i liked gunjack, laszlo, ivan/joe/tsr bits the most

oh yeah... how about a tempo increase next time too, 130bpm is well slow

les diamond · 2nd April 2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by emef

130bpm is well slow

this

decadnids · 2nd April 2009

I'd be up for joining in again, don't care what tempo really. think it works pretty well as it is, so no need to change or add new rules.

cut out · 2nd April 2009

i really enjoyed doing this so count me in for more - and if it's vocals for the next one I can break out Suzi.

**Loz** · 2nd April 2009

130 is probably the best tempo for all the different styles we're going to do

Brownthing · 2nd April 2009

I'd be looking to pull my finger out for next time.

thepigjockey · 2nd April 2009

I like the unpredictability (e.g. change of style/vocal or instrumental etc.) and I think the only thing wrong with this is that I want to hear MOAR! I think the rules work great as they are.

Frankie · 2nd April 2009

i enjoy this, and my friends seem to be responding positively as well. : )

*mdk* · 2nd April 2009

i dont mind if the bpm goes up, once you get above 140 then half time is alright as well.

but if the bpm goes up then we should probably make it 48 bars or each part would be too short.

as it is i agree with emef that they shouldnt be too long because then it doesnt get boring at any point and also you have to keep your focus

**bitconductor** · 2nd April 2009

again, again!

kams · 2nd April 2009

no drum machines or synths in the next one

JE:5 · 2nd April 2009

I'm all for keeping it the same, maybe someone could ramp up the tempo on their bit making sure to note what BPM it has gone to.

**emef** · 2nd April 2009

from 130 to 170 in the last 4 bars mebbe hehe

*Hectic Cum Balthazar* · 2nd April 2009

yeah I think we should continue from isoprax... which is handy cos it means Trevor is all set to give the last four bars to the next person...

I'd say if we are gonna do a bpm change then the best thing to do is do that change before the last 4 bars.. and keep the last 4 bars at a consistent tempo.

*Hectic Cum Balthazar* · 2nd April 2009

or I dunno... maybe you could change your bit so it ramps up in tempo isoprax?

nempsey · 2nd April 2009

it was pretty good, but i think if i was involved i'd have to put a donk on it

kams · 2nd April 2009

or emef go first and crank it up in his bit.. isoprax's bit builds quite nicely at the end as it is

soulcheck · 2nd April 2009

If emef changes the tempo it'll end up as speedcore.

kams · 2nd April 2009

i'd be quite up for some fastness.. not done any for ages

**isoprax** · 2nd April 2009

I thought 130 bpm was perfect. You people whine too much :p

soulcheck · 2nd April 2009

^^^^What he said^^^^

*Spandex* · 2nd April 2009

hehehe... yeah i don't think it turned out too shabby at 130bpm. If it was gonna change I'd want to dial it down a touch...

Could make it a time limit and not worry about the tempo? e.g. everyone gets 60 seconds and can do wotever the fuck they like in it.

Sheridan · 2nd April 2009

130 is the new 140.

AVX23 · 2nd April 2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spandex

hehehe... yeah i don't think it turned out too shabby at 130bpm. If it was gonna change I'd want to dial it down a touch...

Could make it a time limit and not worry about the tempo? e.g. everyone gets 60 seconds and can do wotever the fuck they like in it.

Throw it down like so solid crew

*Spandex* · 2nd April 2009

60 seconds and nothing to comply to

**emef** · 2nd April 2009

i'm fine wi 130bpm

kams · 2nd April 2009

right we need some leadership here - or at least a steering group or committee or something.. this is MADNESS!

**emef** · 2nd April 2009

we could just keep it the same as last time
it worked out pretty good
think i'll do some vocals this time
probably wont mention no-fu collab in them though
twice is enough

1st April 2009	#61
thembuzz 60% andy Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: manchest Posts: 9,952	yeah, ivan/joe/robi is my favourite, i reckon. and a bunch of other people are particularly ace, but i don't want to upset anyone by not mentioning them. also, i haven't bothered looking at who's who
	:: quote post ::

1st April 2009	#62
Loz ......................... Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 7,630	their bit really reminds me of Guided By Voices. In a good way, obviously.
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#63
emef grinning Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: fishing on't pier Posts: 12,731	some people are saying the mix is a bit short i think the beauty of the mix is in the shortness of the tracks, it never gets boring why dont we do it all again? kicking off from where isoprax finished, same 32 bar rule, adding people who missed out and people who wanna go again keep going till we've got a 1 hour+ mix i reckon that'd be great i also really like the doing vocals in the tracks idea ps i liked gunjack, laszlo, ivan/joe/tsr bits the most oh yeah... how about a tempo increase next time too, 130bpm is well slow Last edited by emef : 2nd April 2009 at 00:44.
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#65
decadnids solve et coagula Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: sussex Posts: 6,095	I'd be up for joining in again, don't care what tempo really. think it works pretty well as it is, so no need to change or add new rules.
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#66
cut out internot Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: middle-england Posts: 2,665	i really enjoyed doing this so count me in for more - and if it's vocals for the next one I can break out Suzi.
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#68
Brownthing born ready. Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 462	I'd be looking to pull my finger out for next time.
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#69
thepigjockey whytrance?™ Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 5,953	I like the unpredictability (e.g. change of style/vocal or instrumental etc.) and I think the only thing wrong with this is that I want to hear MOAR! I think the rules work great as they are.
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#70
Frankie clumblebot Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 260	i enjoy this, and my friends seem to be responding positively as well. : )
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#71
mdk Доста Работиш Тато Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: at home. Posts: 3,328	i dont mind if the bpm goes up, once you get above 140 then half time is alright as well. but if the bpm goes up then we should probably make it 48 bars or each part would be too short. as it is i agree with emef that they shouldnt be too long because then it doesnt get boring at any point and also you have to keep your focus
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#72
bitconductor scoony Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: north lun Posts: 998	again, again!
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#73
kams DJ 10p Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: londoon Posts: 5,392	no drum machines or synths in the next one
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#74
JE:5 On the edge of darkness Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Bristol Posts: 5,957	I'm all for keeping it the same, maybe someone could ramp up the tempo on their bit making sure to note what BPM it has gone to.
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#76
Hectic Cum Balthazar Speak to the circuits Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 6,580	yeah I think we should continue from isoprax... which is handy cos it means Trevor is all set to give the last four bars to the next person... I'd say if we are gonna do a bpm change then the best thing to do is do that change before the last 4 bars.. and keep the last 4 bars at a consistent tempo.
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#78
nempsey bottom feeder Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: the bungo Posts: 1,385	it was pretty good, but i think if i was involved i'd have to put a donk on it
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#80
soulcheck Registered Erutufon Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 3,685	If emef changes the tempo it'll end up as speedcore.
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#82
isoprax I tinker too musically Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Hamilton, Ontario Posts: 1,425	I thought 130 bpm was perfect. You people whine too much :p ........................... Fun in the Murky !!
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#84
Spandex Very Bad Dog Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Nottingham Posts: 8,428	hehehe... yeah i don't think it turned out too shabby at 130bpm. If it was gonna change I'd want to dial it down a touch... Could make it a time limit and not worry about the tempo? e.g. everyone gets 60 seconds and can do wotever the fuck they like in it. ........................... lovely cloakroom. lovely cloaks - barbam nondum video
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#85
Sheridan Burnt out Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Druid Hills Posts: 8,799	130 is the new 140.
	:: quote post ::

2nd April 2009	#87
Spandex Very Bad Dog Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Nottingham Posts: 8,428	60 seconds and nothing to comply to ........................... lovely cloakroom. lovely cloaks - barbam nondum video
	:: quote post ::

Thread Tools	SEARCH THIS THREAD
Show Printable Version Email this Page	SEARCH THIS THREAD: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
No Future collab	7875	erutufon central	461	1st April 2009 00:33
yard-collab & conquer [kahvi197]	christtjj	erutufon members events and releases	5	8th December 2006 01:27
what are you reading part whatever...	Paddy	erutufon central	50	1st April 2006 11:30
Id like to see a vogel/pille'ocheoni collab		erutufon central	3	27th March 2004 12:08
Hip Hop (part II)	Loz	erutufon central	15	2nd October 2002 01:19