http://whoshouldyouvotefor.com/

[mr franks]

http://whoshouldyouvotefor.com/

personally i will be hiding under my bed on election day.

[penciLneck]

my radical views got a 70% agreement with lib dems, and 30% green. can't vote at the moment though as I am kind of nfa until I find a new place to call home.

[kams]

yeah lib dems and green came out strong for as well...

I guess its all based on policy though.... whether or not you believe these are deliverable is another question.

[Orang Utan]

I suspect this site is Liberal Democrat backed, as all the questions are related to Liberal manifesto pledges and most people get told to vote for them after completing the quiz

[mr franks]

or maybe you're all beardy lefties...

my result was just the same as pencilnecks...

[Phil]

the only cunts im voting bruv is Green party dun, yeah they aint getting in trust, but dem cunts aint fucking installing Microchips in your mind Dun, fukin gTescos TV, wanna malform your mindset, turning your whol life into Oracle database shit darling. Cunts

[mr franks]

from the site.

Are you doing this on behalf of a political party or interest group?
No, this site is not designed to pursue any political agenda, it is intended purely as a comparative tool for voters.

Are any of the people behind this site members of or contributors to political parties?
We repeat, none of the people behind this site are members of or contributors to any political party. One member of the team does play poker on a regular basis with members/former members of all three parties but, while he might claim otherwise, his loss of money to them is due to lack of skill rather than a desire to make a political donation.

Orang Utan - if we were all nazis we would be reckoning it was backed by tories.

[Paddy]

well im 62% lib dems and 39% greens. this doesn't seem to be the most accurate test though, does it?

[Phil]

lib dems are cunts mate, they some yellow colored fucking proffesional dick heads. Trust me bruv, only ting worth voting is green party, they didnt even print out their cunting manifesto bruv, only available on website blud, thats some save the tree shit for Fraggle rock bruv

[mr franks]

@ niknak - well, if you dont think the results match your political leaning then it's inaccurate. any test like this will always be too broad to be accurate.

[Spandex]

hehehe.. yeh.. it reflects the election fairly accurately...

You get a choice of people, all of whom are broadly the same, none of whom reflect your views. Then when you chose not to vote for any of them, they all wring their hands and say "How can we engage people in the political process?".

BTW, if your decision is "I'm not voting for any of these loons" then please go to your polling station anyway and spoil a ballot paper... It'd be much harder to pretend that it's apathy if everyone actively went out and voted "None of you cunts". That's assuming they count them?

[mr franks]

@spandex - they used to count 'protest votes', when you could put a big fucking cross through all your voting slip, nowadays any voting slip that is not filled correctly is counted an 'damaged', so you cant even register a protest vote anymore. bastards.

[Spandex]

Originally posted by mr franks
@ niknak - well, if you dont think the results match you're political leaning then it's inaccurate. any test like this will always be too broad to be accurate.

I think it's inaccurate cos it's too narrow not too broad. But IMHO that's just a reflection of the "choice" we're being offered anyway.

[Spandex]

Originally posted by mr franks
@spandex - they used to count 'protest votes', when you could put a big fucking cross through all your voting slip, nowadays any voting slip that is not filled correctly is counted an 'damaged', so you cant even register a protest vote anymore. bastards.

arse :/ Do they count "damaged" do you know?

[mr franks]

Originally posted by Spandex


I think it's inaccurate cos it's too narrow not too broad. But IMHO that's just a reflection of the "choice" we're being offered anyway.

yeah, know what you are saying.

[mr franks]

Originally posted by Spandex


arse :/ Do they count "damaged" do you know?

they do count them, but by calling them 'damaged' and 'vandalised' it makes out that its some twats fucking about rather than any kind of protest.

[Spandex]

Hmm... as the number got higher it'd be harder to dismiss tho... at some point "twats fucking about" would have to become "well organised and disgruntled twats who object to the current undemocratic electoral system fucking about"

[JonnySpeed]

I got Lib Dem as expected but I would never vote for them - just the most left wing party we have I suppose.

I vote techno party